Re: markdown 2 man, was Re: Git Community Book
- From
- Abdelrazak Younes <younes@lyx.org>
- Date
- Jul 31, 2008, 11:24 UTC
- Message-ID
- <4891A0D0.6060503@lyx.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vy73j418t.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
Hello,
Sorry for this irruption on this list. I am just a git user and casual reader of this list. I thought I could share my thoughts about this as I know a bit about document creation. Please ignore if this is not appropriate.
Disclaimer: I am involved in LyX development, so anything I said will be biased :-)
Junio C Hamano wrote:
> As I am not in "graphics and screencast" camp, I may probably not be able > to offer much help improving his book, and I suspect some people on this > list might feel the same way. But that's is Ok --- we are not dumping the > User Manual.
IMHO, documentation is best written by users, not developer. So, again IMHO, anything that could accommodate the _user_ for document writing should be done. An enthusiastic user is more likely to spend time writing documentation than a developer. For example, within the LyX project, most writers and translator are not developer.
Asciidoc or Markdown are tools that accommodate the _developer_, not the user. I understand that these markup language are ideally suited for in source documentation (thought I personally much prefer Doxygen). I also understand that launching a different application just to modify a line or two in the user manual seems cumbersome for the developer but IMHO, if you're serious about working on the documentation, you are not going to change a line or two and launching an external application is no big deal.
Now, about my shameless plug: LyX is ideally suited for structured documentation writing :-)
Abdel.