Re: What shall we do with the GECOS field again?
- From
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
- Date
- Sep 19, 2005, 16:06 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vll1trqiq.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <20050919134838.GC2903@pasky.or.cz>
Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz> writes:
> Well, I have to say that from the GECOS fields I saw, none use that > format, but a lot of them used the realname,phone,something,phone,... > format.
> Opinions?
If the real world GECOS were either only plain and name,room,blah,... format as you say and assume I think a heuristics like you suggested would be better than the current heuristics of assuming everything is a name, but I haven't seen what "angry mob" actually has so cannot judge.
What do popular MUAs do to come up with the real-name fields? Don't they face the same problem, trying to using GECOS?