Re: Possible regression in ref advertisement
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Feb 25, 2013, 19:27 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vip5gxkgy.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <1361819916.24515.5.camel@centaur.cmartin.tk>
Carlos Martín Nieto <cmn@elego.de> writes:
Show 9 quoted lines
> On Mon, 2013-02-25 at 10:31 -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> ...
>> Interesting. "git ls-remote . | grep 1.8.0-" for maint, master,
>> next and pu produce identical results for me, all showing peeled
>> ones correctly.
>
> Bisection leads me to Peff's 435c8332 (2012-10-04; upload-pack: use
> peel_ref for ref advertisements) and reverting that commit brings the
> -rc3^{} back.A shot in the dark, as I do not seem to be able to reproduce the issue with anything that contains the commit. Perhaps your .git/packed-refs is corrupt?