Re: What's in git.git (Oct 2008, #03; Tue, 14)
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Oct 15, 2008, 20:26 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vhc7dr4f8.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <20081015202032.GD28802@spearce.org>
"Shawn O. Pearce" <spearce@spearce.org> writes:
Show 5 quoted lines
>> If we can add a test case to demonstrate the existing breakage, I think we >> can (and should) cherry-pick it to 'maint'. > > Yes, it probably should have gone to maint. No, it didn't go there. > Temporary lapse in maintainer judgement.
That is Ok. I do the same all the time (and I try to rewind and rebuild when I spot it before pushing the results out, but I am not always successful).
I just wanted to see if there was any particular reason not to have this on 'maint'.
Thanks.