From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 20:26:03 GMT
Subject: Re: What's in git.git (Oct 2008, #03; Tue, 14)
Message-ID: <7vhc7dr4f8.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <20081015202032.GD28802@spearce.org>

"Shawn O. Pearce" <spearce@spearce.org> writes:

>> If we can add a test case to demonstrate the existing breakage, I think we
>> can (and should) cherry-pick it to 'maint'.
>
> Yes, it probably should have gone to maint.  No, it didn't go there.
> Temporary lapse in maintainer judgement.

That is Ok.  I do the same all the time (and I try to rewind and rebuild
when I spot it before pushing the results out, but I am not always
successful).

I just wanted to see if there was any particular reason not to have this
on 'maint'.

Thanks.