Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] chain kill signals for cleanup functions
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Jan 31, 2009, 00:28 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vd4e49v48.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <20090130082101.GA28809@coredump.intra.peff.net>
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
Show 13 quoted lines
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 09:13:00AM +0100, Johannes Sixt wrote: > >> Jeff King schrieb: >> > One fix would be to just "signal(SIGINT, SIG_DFL)" at the top. But I >> > think it makes the test cleaner to just switch to a more reliable >> > signal. The patch would look something like what is below. But I need to >> > know what exit code Windows generates for SIGTERM. Johannes? >> >> The same as with SIGINT: 3. > > Hmm. Clever. > > Junio, can you apply this on top of the jk/signal-cleanup topic?
Will do, but I've been sick today, haven't caught up with the list traffic, and I do not think I'll be reading my mails for the rest of the day either. It may take some time for it to appear in the public repositories.
Thanks.