Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] chain kill signals for cleanup functions
- From
Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@viscovery.net>
- Date
- Jan 30, 2009, 08:13 UTC
- Message-ID
- <4982B68C.2070207@viscovery.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <20090130075552.GA27716@coredump.intra.peff.net>
Jeff King schrieb:
> One fix would be to just "signal(SIGINT, SIG_DFL)" at the top. But I > think it makes the test cleaner to just switch to a more reliable > signal. The patch would look something like what is below. But I need to > know what exit code Windows generates for SIGTERM. Johannes?
The same as with SIGINT: 3.
-- Hannes