From: Junio C Hamano Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 00:28:39 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] chain kill signals for cleanup functions Message-ID: <7vd4e49v48.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <20090130082101.GA28809@coredump.intra.peff.net> Jeff King writes: > On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 09:13:00AM +0100, Johannes Sixt wrote: > >> Jeff King schrieb: >> > One fix would be to just "signal(SIGINT, SIG_DFL)" at the top. But I >> > think it makes the test cleaner to just switch to a more reliable >> > signal. The patch would look something like what is below. But I need to >> > know what exit code Windows generates for SIGTERM. Johannes? >> >> The same as with SIGINT: 3. > > Hmm. Clever. > > Junio, can you apply this on top of the jk/signal-cleanup topic? Will do, but I've been sick today, haven't caught up with the list traffic, and I do not think I'll be reading my mails for the rest of the day either. It may take some time for it to appear in the public repositories. Thanks.