Re: [PATCH 3/3] t3600: test rm of path with changed leading symlinks
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Apr 4, 2013, 23:33 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vd2u9g9bg.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <20130404232903.GA27128@sigill.intra.peff.net>
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
> So let's drop patch 3. Do we want instead to have an expect_failure > documenting the correct behavior?
I think that is very much preferred.