From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2013 23:33:39 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] t3600: test rm of path with changed leading symlinks
Message-ID: <7vd2u9g9bg.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <20130404232903.GA27128@sigill.intra.peff.net>

Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:

> So let's drop patch 3. Do we want instead to have an expect_failure
> documenting the correct behavior?

I think that is very much preferred.