Re: [PATCH] git-commit: revamp the git-commit semantics.

From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Date: Feb 8, 2006, 05:41 UTC
Message-ID: <7vbqxiquem.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0602071412390.5397@localhost.localdomain>

Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org> writes:

> As someone refreshed my memory in private, there is no "unstable" branch 
> like Linux used to have.  But hopefully you all understood what I meant 
> i.e. in the main branch after the stable 1.2.0 branch is forked.

Yes I understood what you meant. Eventually we ship with --only as the default and the best timing is between 1.2.0 and 1.3.0.

I am just worried if it might turn out to be like shipping a bicycle with training wheels welded onto it (so it cannot be easily removed). That is where my reluctance comes from.

But I do not have to be convinced 100% myself in order to set it to the default, as long as the more important users are happy.