Re: [PATCH] git-commit: revamp the git-commit semantics.
- From
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
- Date
- Feb 5, 2006, 20:03 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7v64ntindq.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <e5bfff550602050536j73f1091dq9afae232f574d0b4@mail.gmail.com>
I was planning to think about the migration strategy _after_ I get the feeling that everybody who got confused by the current one thinks this is a good change, and I am glad you did that work for me ;-).
I think it is sane to add a no-op '--include' to the current version.
I am not sure if it is worth to take two-phased introduction of this new "temporary index" thing. We could:
* add '--only' that asks for the new "temporary index" thing.
* initially make '--include' the default, not '--only'.
* later switch the default to '--only'.