Re: [PATCH/RFC] blame: accept multiple -L ranges
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Jul 22, 2013, 21:34 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7va9lecm8l.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <87bo5uqu6i.fsf@linux-k42r.v.cablecom.net>
Thomas Rast <trast@inf.ethz.ch> writes:
> I'll just leave it at that and let you decide what to do (presumably go > ahead as you already outlined). I've never actually ever used multiple > -L in the same log/blame invocation, anyway.
Nobody has ;-).
It is just between my "I often wished while looking at 'less foo.c' I wanted to give more than on -L to cover two ranges I see in the file" and your "I do not know if the user can give the first -L to cover the first range and the second -L to cover the second range". I do not think neither of us successfully gave more than one -L and got any useful result.