Re: [PATCH/RFC] blame: accept multiple -L ranges
- From
Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jul 9, 2013, 19:21 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20130709192119.GY408@google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <87a9lvcztv.fsf@hexa.v.cablecom.net>
Thomas Rast wrote:
Show 10 quoted lines
> If you define it that way, the output of > > git blame -L 4,6; git blame -L /A/,+20 > > is significantly different from > > git blame -L 4,6 -L /A/,+20 > > Not just in the presentation or any possible coalescing, but in the > meaning of the ranges.
I can see both meanings being useful. I suspect that the "restart at the top of the file for each LHS regex" meaning would be more useful, though.
Thanks, Jonathan