From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 21:34:34 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] blame: accept multiple -L ranges
Message-ID: <7va9lecm8l.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <87bo5uqu6i.fsf@linux-k42r.v.cablecom.net>

Thomas Rast <trast@inf.ethz.ch> writes:

> I'll just leave it at that and let you decide what to do (presumably go
> ahead as you already outlined).  I've never actually ever used multiple
> -L in the same log/blame invocation, anyway.

Nobody has ;-).

It is just between my "I often wished while looking at 'less foo.c'
I wanted to give more than on -L to cover two ranges I see in the
file" and your "I do not know if the user can give the first -L to
cover the first range and the second -L to cover the second range".
I do not think neither of us successfully gave more than one -L and
got any useful result.