Re: Request for help from binary packaging people.
- From
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
- Date
- Aug 8, 2005, 22:49 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7v8xzc11ue.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <20050808222119.GE7762@shell0.pdx.osdl.net>
Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org> writes:
Show 7 quoted lines
>> I take it to mean that we do not have to explicitly list perl >> module dependencies. If that is the case then I presume that >> the current dependency list is fine. > > That's correct. The only benefit to itemzing the package level dependency in > this case is just for an error message that tells you which package > you're missing rather than the low-level perl module.
Again, thanks.