Re: My Itchlist
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Aug 6, 2005, 06:50 UTC
- Message-ID
- <Pine.LNX.4.63.0508060846050.12882@wgmdd8.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de>
- In-Reply-To
- <Pine.LNX.4.58.0508051924390.3258@g5.osdl.org>
Hi,
On Fri, 5 Aug 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Show 15 quoted lines
> On Fri, 5 Aug 2005, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > > > - Teach fetch-pack reference renaming. > > Well, the fetch side at least needs it less. > > Right now the renaming means that you can only really fetch _one_ head at > a time, but that's at least a fairly common and important case, and you > can do the rest from there. > > And doing only one means that git-fetch-pack can just return the result > SHA1 of the head it was asked to fetch. In fact, even that could just be > extended to returning multiple heads: just return each SHA1 in order. No > "renaming" necessary, since it's then up to the user what to do with the > results.
I think that we need a method to do a push in reverse: If a central repository has several branches, I might want to pull just those branches where the local head is a strict parent of the remote side, and get complains for the others. And maybe reference naming comes as a freebie with that.
Ciao, Dscho