From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 22:49:13 GMT
Subject: Re: Request for help from binary packaging people.
Message-ID: <7v8xzc11ue.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
In-Reply-To: <20050808222119.GE7762@shell0.pdx.osdl.net>

Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org> writes:

>> I take it to mean that we do not have to explicitly list perl
>> module dependencies.  If that is the case then I presume that
>> the current dependency list is fine.
>
> That's correct.  The only benefit to itemzing the package level dependency in
> this case is just for an error message that tells you which package
> you're missing rather than the low-level perl module.

Again, thanks.