Re: git-rev-list: proper lazy reachability
- From
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
- Date
- Jun 4, 2005, 19:30 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7v7jh9hqc5.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <Pine.LNX.4.58.0506040847170.1876@ppc970.osdl.org>
>>>>> "LT" == Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> writes:
LT> On Sat, 4 Jun 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> Does this fix it for you (untested, of course)?
Will check later.
LT> Would people prefer to have "git-rev-list" take arguments like LT> git-rev-list a b ^c ^d LT> the way git-rev-tree does?
I do not expect myself to maintain many heads like Jeff, I cannot comment on how well that "many heads" feature would work in practice, but I would vote "a ^b" syntax to match git-rev-tree.