From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2005 19:30:50 GMT
Subject: Re: git-rev-list: proper lazy reachability
Message-ID: <7v7jh9hqc5.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0506040847170.1876@ppc970.osdl.org>

>>>>> "LT" == Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> writes:

LT> On Sat, 4 Jun 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote:

>> Does this fix it for you (untested, of course)?

Will check later.

LT> Would people prefer to have "git-rev-list" take arguments like
LT> 	git-rev-list a b ^c ^d
LT> the way git-rev-tree does?

I do not expect myself to maintain many heads like Jeff, I
cannot comment on how well that "many heads" feature would work
in practice, but I would vote "a ^b" syntax to match
git-rev-tree.