Re: [PATCH/RFC] filter-branch: support skipping of commits more easily
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Jun 8, 2007, 00:42 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7v7iqfnuo3.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0706080058160.4046@racer.site>
Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:
Show 14 quoted lines
> When commit-filter echoes just "skip", just skip that commit by mapping > its object name to the same (possibly rewritten) object name(s) its > parent(s) are mapped to. > > IOW, given A-B-C, if commit-filter says "skip" upon B, the rewritten > branch will look like this: A'-C'. > > Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> > --- > > Of course, if you think of "patchsets", this behaviour might > be unexpected, since the children will still contain everything > which was changed in the skipped revisions, and not changed in > _them_.
I think that is fine; in effect, by saying "skip" B, you are squashing B-C into C'.
Does this mean that, given
C---D---E
/ /
A---Band if commit-filter says "skip" on D, the written history would look like this?
C'------E'
/ /
A'--B'--'The new commit E' would become an evil merge that has difference between D and E in the original history?
I am not objecting; just trying to get a mental picture.