From: Junio C Hamano Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2007 00:42:36 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] filter-branch: support skipping of commits more easily Message-ID: <7v7iqfnuo3.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> In-Reply-To: Johannes Schindelin writes: > When commit-filter echoes just "skip", just skip that commit by mapping > its object name to the same (possibly rewritten) object name(s) its > parent(s) are mapped to. > > IOW, given A-B-C, if commit-filter says "skip" upon B, the rewritten > branch will look like this: A'-C'. > > Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin > --- > > Of course, if you think of "patchsets", this behaviour might > be unexpected, since the children will still contain everything > which was changed in the skipped revisions, and not changed in > _them_. I think that is fine; in effect, by saying "skip" B, you are squashing B-C into C'. Does this mean that, given C---D---E / / A---B and if commit-filter says "skip" on D, the written history would look like this? C'------E' / / A'--B'--' The new commit E' would become an evil merge that has difference between D and E in the original history? I am not objecting; just trying to get a mental picture.