Re: [PATCH v2 06/10] sequencer.c: teach append_signoff how to detect duplicate s-o-b
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Jan 28, 2013, 02:06 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7v7gmy12op.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <CA+sFfMcyupLGPt8-3PWMzwgGR3zrm4ZfA-7KwBh5VkMXmhuTKQ@mail.gmail.com>
Brandon Casey <drafnel@gmail.com> writes:
Show 19 quoted lines
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 12:38 AM, Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> wrote: >> Brandon Casey wrote: >> >>> Teach append_signoff how to detect a duplicate s-o-b in the commit footer. >>> This is in preparation to unify the append_signoff implementations in >>> log-tree.c and sequencer.c. >> [...] >>> --- a/sequencer.c >>> +++ b/sequencer.c >>> @@ -1082,9 +1101,10 @@ int sequencer_pick_revisions(struct replay_opts *opts) >>> return pick_commits(todo_list, opts); >>> } >>> >>> -void append_signoff(struct strbuf *msgbuf, int ignore_footer) >>> +void append_signoff(struct strbuf *msgbuf, int ignore_footer, int no_dup_sob) >> >> Isn't the behavior of passing '1' here just a bug in "format-patch -s"? > > I think that is an open question.
Yes. as I said in a previous review round, I think it was a mistake that format-patch chose to pay attention to any S-o-b in the patch trail, not only the last one, and we may want to correcct it once this series solidifies as a separate "bugfix" change on top.