Re: [PATCH] archive: re-allow HEAD:Documentation on a remote invocation
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Jan 12, 2012, 03:20 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7v62gh4nex.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <20120112031022.GC26363@sigill.intra.peff.net>
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
> For a maint release, I am OK with that. In the long term, I'd rather my > patches go onto master (either for 1.7.9 or for later), as I think they > are the right way to do it.
I would prefer not to use it in 1.7.9, as CMN's patch will make its only immediate user disappear. I think we are in agreement that the change to carry context around is a longer term thing, and when we apply it, the safety we added to "archive" will become simpler.