Re: [PATCH] "sleep 1" sleeps too little on cygwin
- From
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
- Date
- Jan 18, 2006, 17:00 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7v4q41zd1t.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <Pine.LNX.4.63.0601181233460.8678@wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de>
Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:
> And where does the time lag (required for the test) come from now?
The point of the change is that it avoids to depend on the time lag. The test is to make sure we catch dirty index; instead of timestamp difference it now uses i-num difference for that.