Re: [PATCH] "sleep 1" sleeps too little on cygwin
- From
- Christopher Faylor <me@cgf.cx>
- Date
- Jan 19, 2006, 05:20 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20060119052043.GB8121@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vmzhtqakl.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 05:18:50PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 9 quoted lines
>Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@gmail.com> writes: > >> this is probable unsafe too: not all systems export inodes >> (the recent cygwin breakage comes to mind). > >Hmph. I thought that breakage was about struct dirent, not what >we read from struct stat; d_ino is XSI extension so that may >have been the reason cygwin folks removed it, but st_ino is in >BASE --- did they remove that as well?
No, we didn't. We (i.e., I) removed d_ino in cygwin because it couldn't be reliably calculated without slowing things down. st_ino will always be there.
cgf