From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 17:00:30 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] "sleep 1" sleeps too little on cygwin
Message-ID: <7v4q41zd1t.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0601181233460.8678@wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de>

Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:

> And where does the time lag (required for the test) come from now?

The point of the change is that it avoids to depend on the time
lag.  The test is to make sure we catch dirty index; instead of
timestamp difference it now uses i-num difference for that.