Re: [PATCH] Speed up history generation
- From
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
- Date
- Jul 1, 2006, 01:20 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7v3bdmglxo.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <20060701011112.892.qmail@web31813.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Luben Tuikov <ltuikov@yahoo.com> writes:
Show 18 quoted lines
> --- Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> wrote:
>...
>> > @@ -2295,16 +2295,12 @@ sub git_history {
>> > "</div>\n";
>> > print "<div class=\"page_path\"><b>/" . esc_html($file_name) . "</b><br/></div>\n";
>> >
>> > - open my $fd, "-|", "$gitbin/git-rev-list $hash | $gitbin/git-diff-tree -r --stdin --
>> > \'$file_name\'";
>> > - my $commit;
>> > + open my $fd, "-|", "$gitbin/git-rev-list $hash -- \'$file_name\'";
>>
>> This would speed things up but at the same time it changes the
>> semantics because it involves merge simplification, no?
>>
>> At least that should be noted in the commit log.
>
> Ok, I guess this should be in the log. Can you add it please when
> commiting to the master git branch?Well, by "at least", what I meant was that it might make sense to pass "--full-history" option to be more compatible with the original output. For graphical output like gitk, --full-history makes a mess on the screen, but a list-oriented output like gitweb it might be less confusing to show all the alternate paths that touched the path than leaving some histories out.