Re: [kernel.org users] [RFC] "clone --naked"?
- From
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
- Date
- Jan 17, 2006, 08:17 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7v1wz7clps.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <43CCB1D3.10309.35645D@Ulrich.Windl.rkdvmks1.ngate.uni-regensburg.de>
"Ulrich Windl" <ulrich.windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de> writes:
> ... My original intention was that I > thought them to be little descriptive regarding their > function. You seem to have "--bare" and "--naked". Hard to > guess what they really do.
True. "A repository without an associated working tree". I do not know a short and sweet phrase to describe that (well, except "bare" and "naked", which I kind of already got used to).
Whatever word we choose to describe that, it should go to the glossary document.