Re: [kernel.org users] [RFC] "clone --naked"?

From: Ulrich Windl <ulrich.windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de>
Date: Jan 17, 2006, 07:58 UTC
Message-ID: <43CCB1D3.10309.35645D@Ulrich.Windl.rkdvmks1.ngate.uni-regensburg.de>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0601161114080.13339@g5.osdl.org>

Hi!

Maybe let me clarify: I don't have anything against any of those particular words. My original intention was that I thought them to be little descriptive regarding their function. You seem to have "--bare" and "--naked". Hard to guess what they really do. The suggestion to select better words was not primarily because of underaged using Linux or any SPAM issues. That part was just a joke. Sorry.

Regards, Ulrich

On 16 Jan 2006 at 11:17, Linus Torvalds wrote:

Show 21 quoted lines

> 
> 
> On Mon, 16 Jan 2006, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > 
> > While I don't give a rats bottom about the "21"-ness of naked, "naked"
> > is more likely to trigger spam traps than "bare" though... just a side
> > consideration but unfortunately needed nowadays ;(
> 
> Yeah. I've had spamassassin kill patches to the aic7xxx driver because the 
> subject said "aic7xxx", and the "xxx" triggered as being a bad word.
> 
> Now, "naked" doesn't seem to trigger anything for spamassassin, but I 
> wouldn't be entirely surprised if some web-content blocker were to be 
> over-eager at times. So "bare" might be safer.
> 
> 		Linus
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users@linux.kernel.org
> http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/users