From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 08:17:19 GMT
Subject: Re: [kernel.org users] [RFC] "clone --naked"?
Message-ID: <7v1wz7clps.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
In-Reply-To: <43CCB1D3.10309.35645D@Ulrich.Windl.rkdvmks1.ngate.uni-regensburg.de>

"Ulrich Windl" <ulrich.windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de> writes:

> ...  My original intention was that I
> thought them to be little descriptive regarding their
> function.  You seem to have "--bare" and "--naked". Hard to
> guess what they really do.

True.  "A repository without an associated working tree".  I do
not know a short and sweet phrase to describe that (well, except
"bare" and "naked", which I kind of already got used to).

Whatever word we choose to describe that, it should go to the
glossary document.