Re: [PATCH] blame: prevent a segv when -L given start > EOF
- From
Jay Soffian <jaysoffian@gmail.com>
- Date
- Feb 9, 2010, 04:02 UTC
- Message-ID
- <76718491002082002n587c4b05x44e5f577cf17a8e1@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <76718491002082000s7be5b32dob5b3dfe764b12da0@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 11:00 PM, Jay Soffian <jaysoffian@gmail.com> wrote:
>> so checking with bottom alone should suffice, no? > > Ah true. You can squash that in? :-)
Actually, no, that doesn't work, but my head can't keep bottom=start, top=end straight so I'm not even sure why not.
j.