Re: [L10N] Kickoff of translation for Git 2.10.0 round 1

> > Let's cut it like this : first ten are literally translated, the following
> > ones fall back to a general rule.
> 
> I actually once wrote "It is rare to squash dozens of commits into
> one, so the first ten or dozen messages that spell the ordinals out
> may be a good thing for readability", in the message you are
> responding to, before realizing that the messages actually say
> "1st", "2nd", etc., not "first", "second", etc., and scrapped that
> part of the response.  I do not really see much point in forcing the
> first ten to be translated differently.