[PATCH] am: ignore return value of write_file()
- From
René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
- Date
- Jul 7, 2016, 20:02 UTC
- Message-ID
- <577EB546.1090007@web.de>
write_file() either returns 0 or dies, so there is no point in checking its return value. The callers of the wrappers write_state_text(), write_state_count() and write_state_bool() consequently already ignore their return values. Stop pretenting we care and make them void.
Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de> --- builtin/am.c | 18 +++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/builtin/am.c b/builtin/am.c index d5da5fe..339e360 100644 --- a/builtin/am.c +++ b/builtin/am.c @@ -184,22 +184,22 @@ static inline const char *am_path(const struct am_state *state, const char *path /** * For convenience to call write_file() */ -static int write_state_text(const struct am_state *state, - const char *name, const char *string) +static void write_state_text(const struct am_state *state, + const char *name, const char *string) { - return write_file(am_path(state, name), "%s", string); + write_file(am_path(state, name), "%s", string); } -static int write_state_count(const struct am_state *state, - const char *name, int value) +static void write_state_count(const struct am_state *state, + const char *name, int value) { - return write_file(am_path(state, name), "%d", value); + write_file(am_path(state, name), "%d", value); } -static int write_state_bool(const struct am_state *state, - const char *name, int value) +static void write_state_bool(const struct am_state *state, + const char *name, int value) { - return write_state_text(state, name, value ? "t" : "f"); + write_state_text(state, name, value ? "t" : "f"); } /**
-- 2.9.0