Re: [PATCH 2/6] connect: uniformize and group CONNECT_DIAG_URL handling code

> On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 06:56:54AM +0200, Torsten Bögershausen wrote:
>> On 05/01/2016 08:02 AM, Mike Hommey wrote:
>>> +	if (flags & CONNECT_DIAG_URL) {
>>>    		printf("Diag: url=%s\n", url ? url : "NULL");
>>>    		printf("Diag: protocol=%s\n", prot_name(protocol));
>>>    		printf("Diag: hostandport=%s\n", hostandport ? hostandport : "NULL");
>>> +		printf("Diag: userandhost=%s\n", host ? host : "NULL");
>>> +		printf("Diag: port=%s\n", port ? port : "NONE");
>>>    		printf("Diag: path=%s\n", path ? path : "NULL");
>>>    		conn = NULL;
>> Does it make sense  to write the host twice?
>> If things are cleaned up, would something like this make sense ?
>>
>> 		printf("Diag: url=%s\n", url ? url : "NULL");
>>   		printf("Diag: protocol=%s\n", prot_name(protocol));
>> 		printf("Diag: user=%s\n", user ? user : "NULL");
>>   		printf("Diag: host=%s\n", host ? host : "NULL");
>> 		printf("Diag: port=%s\n", port ? port : "NONE");
>>   		printf("Diag: path=%s\n", path ? path : "NULL");
>
> That's what I'm converging towards, in the end. There is one thing that
> needs hostandport, though: the git protocol host header. But I don't
> really like that parse_connect_url would return user, host, port, *and*
> hostandport. How about "reconstructing" hostandport in that case, adding
> square brackets when the host contains colons?
>
> BTW, the git protocol currently doesn't reject urls with users and
> doesn't seem to handle them properly either. My changes would fix this
> by separating user and host at the parse_connect_url level, but the
> question then is what to do when there is a user part? die()?
>
> Mike
>