Re: [PATCH v1] config.c: fix msvc compile error

> Beat Bolli <dev+git@drbeat.li> writes:
> 
>> On 24.07.18 20:22, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>>
>>>> This was already fixed (differently) in
>>>> <20180705183445.30901-1-dev+git@drbeat.li>.
>>>
>>> Thanks for saving me from having to dig the list archive myself.
>>> Yes, it is already applied to the tip of the topic that originally
>>> caused the breakage.
>>>
>> Just a general question:
>>
>> Is it OK to refer to patches on pu with the Message-ID, or would you
>> prefer the commit hash? The hash changes whenever you recreate pu,
>> doesn't it?
> 
> Either is fine in practice.  The commits themselves on a topic
> branch that is not yet in 'next' usually stay the same once the tip
> of 'pu' that contains them gets published.  Even though I often use
> "git rebase -i", "git commit --amend", etc. to fix up posted patches
> while turning them into commits on topic branches, I usually stop
> doing so once I push out day's integration result.
> 
> Until a new version of the series is posted to replace them on the
> topic branch, that is.  But at that point we are talking about new
> patches with different message-ids that got turned into different
> commit objects, so either commit object name or message id that
> refer to older iteration would still name the same old version, and
> new names would refer to the same new version.
>