Re: [PATCH] t7510: do not fail when gpg warns about insecure memory

> On Mar 8, 2015, at 18:22, brian m. carlson wrote:
> 
>> On Sun, Mar 08, 2015 at 06:15:55PM -0400, Eric Sunshine wrote:
>>> On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 6:04 PM, brian m. carlson
>>> <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> wrote:
>>>> Perhaps this is better?
>>>>
>>>> Unfortunately when running the test, that message is found in the   
>>>> standard
>>>> output of git show -s --show-signature, but in the standard  error  
>>>> of git
>>>> verify-commit -v causing the comparisons of both standard  output  
>>>> and
>>>> standard error to fail.
>>>
>>> That doesn't help me parse it any better.  It's the "but" without a
>>> corresponding "not" which seems to be throwing me off. Typically, one
>>> would write "this but not that" or "not this but that". I can't tell
>>> if there is a "not" missing or if the "but" is supposed to be an  
>>> "and"
>>> or if something else was intended.
>>
>> The intended meaning is "and" with the additional sense of contrast.  
>> The sentence, if read with verbal emphasis, is, "…is found in the  
>> standard *output* of git show -s --signature, but in the standard  
>> *error* of git verify-commit -v", thus demonstrating why the test  
>> fails: the pairs of output files don't match up.
>>
>> Maybe you can suggest a less confusing wording.
> 
> I like Brian's wording, but how about this slight variation, does this  
> parse any better for you?
> 
> Unfortunately when running the test, while that message is found in
> the standard output of git show -s --show-signature, it is found in
> the standard error of git verify-commit -v causing the comparisons
> of both standard output and standard error to fail.
> 
> -Kyle
>