Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] merge-base: "--reflog" mode finds fork point from reflog entries
Am 10/25/2013 10:09, schrieb John Keeping:
Show 6 quoted lines
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 09:12:10AM +0200, Johannes Sixt wrote:
>> You could put the loops into a function from which you 'return', but that
>> is obscure in this case. The first iteration was better, IMO.
>
> Wouldn't it be simpler to just return from the test? That is, replace
> the "break" in the above patch with "return 1".
Good catch! We explicitly have
test_eval_ () {
# This is a separate function because some tests use
# "return" to end a test_expect_success block early.
eval </dev/null >&3 2>&4 "$*"
}to protect this use of return.
-- Hannes