Re: [PATCH] branch: use $curr_branch_short more
- From
René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
- Date
- Aug 31, 2013, 09:11 UTC
- Message-ID
- <5221B324.7020908@web.de>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAMP44s1qyF70eSCM4L1Yr=U02AwFZ0TNqiDvag8Qdzzi9GS1Mw@mail.gmail.com>
Am 31.08.2013 10:22, schrieb Felipe Contreras:
>> Subject: branch: use $curr_branch_short more > > Why? I don't think that summary explains the reason for being for this > patch, also, it starts with branch: instead of pull:
You're right about "branch" vs. "pull". I'll better go back to bed. ~_~
> Subject: pull: trivial simplification > > With that summary, people would have an easier time figuring out if > they need to read more about the patch or not.
"trivial simplification" is too generic; we could have lots of them. A summary should describe the change. Its low complexity can be derived from it -- using an existing variable a bit more is not very exciting.
But I wouldn't call that patch trivial because its correctness depends on code outside of its shown context.
The reason for the patch isn't mentioned explicitly. Perhaps it should be. I felt that using something that's already there instead of recreating it is motivation alone.
René