Re: [PATCH 1/4] Build in git-repack
- From
Stefan Beller <stefanbeller@googlemail.com>
- Date
- Aug 7, 2013, 16:45 UTC
- Message-ID
- <520279BE.90704@googlemail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <7v38qlec2w.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On 08/07/2013 05:48 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 10 quoted lines
> Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr> writes: >> >> seems overkill to me: why don't you just let cmd_repack call >> update_server_info(0)? > > My feeling exactly. I would rather see a patch that does not touch > pack-objects at all, and use run_command() interface to spawn it. > Once we do have to pack, the necessary processing cycle will dwarf > the fork/exec latency anyway, no? >
Thanks for clarification. That was my initial idea as well, to not touch the pack-objects logic.
However Duy send that patch (basically as is, I just made it apply again), and I guessed that I'd get to results faster with an already existing approach.
I will reconsider and try to remove the additional logic from pack-objects again (so it will not get touched) and move it to the repack itself. It is just a way to understand, 'what needs to be done'.
Stefan