Re: [PATCH 3/5] rebase: fix sequence continuation
- From
Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
- Date
- May 29, 2013, 05:53 UTC
- Message-ID
- <51a597e95039e_7242869e1c713f5@nysa.mail>
- In-Reply-To
- <7v4ndmybwl.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 7 quoted lines
> Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> writes: > > > We are not in am mode. > > That may make sense, but shouldn't this part be like so from the > very beginning? In other words, this looks like an "oops, 1/5 was > buggy and this is a hotfix".
How can 1/5 be introducing a bug? It's merely splitting the code without introducing *ANY* functional changes.
The bug is already there in 'master'.
-- Felipe Contreras