From: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 05:53:45 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] rebase: fix sequence continuation
Message-ID: <51a597e95039e_7242869e1c713f5@nysa.mail>
In-Reply-To: <7v4ndmybwl.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>

Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> writes:
> 
> > We are not in am mode.
> 
> That may make sense, but shouldn't this part be like so from the
> very beginning?  In other words, this looks like an "oops, 1/5 was
> buggy and this is a hotfix".

How can 1/5 be introducing a bug? It's merely splitting the code without
introducing *ANY* functional changes.

The bug is already there in 'master'.

-- 
Felipe Contreras