Re: [PATCH] fixup! t3210: test for spurious error messages for dangling packed refs
- From
Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
- Date
- Apr 24, 2013, 15:25 UTC
- Message-ID
- <5177F981.60105@alum.mit.edu>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vehe1i1bo.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On 04/23/2013 07:50 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 9 quoted lines
> Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> writes: > >> Let me know if you would prefer that I re-roll. > > Your fix-up cleanly applied to the result of applying the series up > to 16/33 and it was trivial to squash it in. > > Please holler if what I push out on 'pu' in 8 hours or so looks > wrong.
It looks like you did the right thing, except using v1 of my patch series rather than v2. Please do the same procedure with v2: apply the v2 series on top of jc/prune-all, apply the fixup commit "fixup! t3210", and rebase the fixup to autosquash it onto patch 16/33.
Thanks, Michael
-- Michael Haggerty mhagger@alum.mit.edu http://softwareswirl.blogspot.com/