Re: [PATCH] fixup! t3210: test for spurious error messages for dangling packed refs
- From
Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
- Date
- Apr 27, 2013, 05:43 UTC
- Message-ID
- <517B6590.2080101@alum.mit.edu>
- In-Reply-To
- <5177F981.60105@alum.mit.edu>
On 04/24/2013 05:25 PM, Michael Haggerty wrote:
Show 15 quoted lines
> On 04/23/2013 07:50 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> writes: >> >>> Let me know if you would prefer that I re-roll. >> >> Your fix-up cleanly applied to the result of applying the series up >> to 16/33 and it was trivial to squash it in. >> >> Please holler if what I push out on 'pu' in 8 hours or so looks >> wrong. > > It looks like you did the right thing, except using v1 of my patch > series rather than v2. Please do the same procedure with v2: apply the > v2 series on top of jc/prune-all, apply the fixup commit "fixup! t3210", > and rebase the fixup to autosquash it onto patch 16/33.
The new version (0859ff6fe6) that I just fetched from you looks right.
Thanks! Michael
-- Michael Haggerty mhagger@alum.mit.edu http://softwareswirl.blogspot.com/