From: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 15:25:53 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fixup! t3210: test for spurious error messages for dangling packed refs
Message-ID: <5177F981.60105@alum.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <7vehe1i1bo.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>

On 04/23/2013 07:50 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> writes:
> 
>> Let me know if you would prefer that I re-roll.
> 
> Your fix-up cleanly applied to the result of applying the series up
> to 16/33 and it was trivial to squash it in.
> 
> Please holler if what I push out on 'pu' in 8 hours or so looks
> wrong.

It looks like you did the right thing, except using v1 of my patch
series rather than v2.  Please do the same procedure with v2: apply the
v2 series on top of jc/prune-all, apply the fixup commit "fixup! t3210",
and rebase the fixup to autosquash it onto patch 16/33.

Thanks,
Michael

-- 
Michael Haggerty
mhagger@alum.mit.edu
http://softwareswirl.blogspot.com/