From: Sam Vilain <sam@vilain.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 19:59:27 GMT
Subject: Re: Git.pm
Message-ID: <4F99A91F.3050307@vilain.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAB3zAY3-Bn86bCr7Rxqi4vxbYFxUesLwm8gddxyMSexov2tOhw@mail.gmail.com>

On 4/25/12 9:15 PM, Subho Banerjee wrote:
> --->  I see in the code that it says that the API is experimental. Is
> there any absolute need for backward compatibility, or can I try to
> redesign the API somewhat extensively?

If you stick to putting new APIs under different namespaces, or new 
functions, then you should be able to preserve API compatibility.  I 
think Git.pm is now too widely used for breaking compatibility to be an 
option.

I think I submitted a Git::Config to this list some time ago; did you 
find that?

Sam