Re: [PATCH] rebase --fix: interactive fixup mode
- From
- Neal Kreitzinger <nkreitzinger@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jan 10, 2012, 19:58 UTC
- Message-ID
- <4F0C984C.8040907@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <4F0AA7E2.9010200@alum.mit.edu>
On 1/9/2012 2:40 AM, Michael Haggerty wrote:
Show 15 quoted lines
> > Two comments: > > * The name "--fix" might be confusing because of its similarity to the > "fixup" command that can be specified in the interactive instructions file. > > * I agree with you that "interactive rebase is frequently used not to > rebase history, but to manipulate recent commits". In fact, I use > interactive rebase *only* for manipulating recent commits and > non-interactive rebase *only* for changing commits' ancestry. I think > it is a good idea to make these two uses more distinct. For example, it > makes me nervous that I might mis-type the<upstream> parameter when I > am trying to touch up commits and end up inadvertently rebasing the > commits onto a new parent. >
He could all it --touchup like you did above.
v/r, neal