Re: [PATCH] rebase --fix: interactive fixup mode
- From
Clemens Buchacher <drizzd@aon.at>
- Date
- Jan 8, 2012, 22:19 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20120108221946.GA22680@ecki.lan>
- In-Reply-To
- <m3r4z9eu36.fsf@localhost.localdomain>
On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 01:57:03PM -0800, Jakub Narebski wrote:
Show 6 quoted lines
> > > In order to determine a suitable range automatically, it is a reasonable > > heuristic to rebase onto the most recent merge commit. > > Why not additionally / instead take into account remote-tracking > branches for "push" remotes?
For me personally, remote-tracking does not work. I frequently branch locally, and even if I do branch from a remote branch, it's often not from a public branch, but rather my own private branch that I synchronize between repos and machines. So my remote-tracking configuration is usually an awful mess, and it does not feel like fixing it up manually would be worth the trouble.
As a result, I don't trust remote-tracking and I do not use any of the features associated with it. For my uses of rebase --fix it would therefore be counter-productive to consider remote-tracking information.
What I did consider was adding a comment to the list of "pick <commit>" that interactive rebase offers saying:
# older commits are already contained in the current upstream branch
Also, I often rewrite commits that are also contained in other branches. That typically happens when I am reworking a topic that has already been tested extensively. In that case I like to keep the original branch around for reference, even if I end up not using it eventually.