Re: [PATCH] commit: allow partial commits with relative paths

> On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 06:45:40PM +0200, Michael J Gruber wrote:
>>
>>> With your permission I am stealing your commit message.
>>
>> I don't care about the message but don't see the point of this patch.
>> Using the same message certainly won't explain the difference...
> 
> Well, to be fair I did add to your message, explaining what I did.
> 
> The point of providing a prefix at all is performance optimization.
> If you say there is no common prefix for the files of interest,
> then you cannot leave any files out and you have to read the entire
> tree into the index.
> 
> But even if we cannot use the working directory as a prefix, we can
> still figure out if there is a common prefix for all given paths,
> and use that instead. I merely copied that idea from ls-tree.
> 

> And considering that most of my patch the almost verbatim move of a
> function from one file to another, I think my change is not that
> big:
> 
>>>  4 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
> 
> Clemens