Re: [PATCH] remote: allow "-t" with fetch mirrors
- From
Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@viscovery.net>
- Date
- May 26, 2011, 15:26 UTC
- Message-ID
- <4DDE7116.4070900@viscovery.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <20110526151100.GA2881@sigill.intra.peff.net>
Am 5/26/2011 17:11, schrieb Jeff King:
> + if (mirror && !(mirror & MIRROR_FETCH) && track.nr)
> + die("specifying branches to track makes no sense with non-fetch mirrors");Don't proliferate no double negation. How about:
+ die("specifying branches to track makes sense only with fetch mirrors");?
-- Hannes